[EMS Discuss] New Storage Rules for Eugene Maker Space
Fri Nov 1 12:53:19 PDT 2013
I actually think we could make more shelves in our current space, but they
would just have to be higher storage. Wall mounted shelving might be a
really good idea in our current space. If we could move all the current
member storage to something wall mounted then we could free up all the
floor space where the shelves currently are. Not that I think we should
sink a lot of money into our current space (since we are looking for a new
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Bob Miller <EMAIL HIDDEN> wrote:
> In our current space, we do not have room to build a lot more shelves.
> We are pretty much out of wall space. We could replace the current
> shelving and get maybe 20% better utilization, but I don't see how to
> improve past that.
> In a hypothetical new space, we should reconsider how much space each
> member gets.
> As for DIY vs. store-bought shelving, I think that's orthogonal to the
> proposal, except that DIY shelving could indeed let us put up more
> total shelving in a new space.
> I need more convincing to increase the shelf space included with
> membership in our current space.
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Kevin King <EMAIL HIDDEN> wrote:
> > To go along with the storage proposal, a change needs to be made in our
> > storage capabilities. The Gorilla racks that we currently use are good,
> > sturdier and larger racks can be built for cheaper. I have built shelves
> > similar to the ones the link below. They are very sturdy and are easily
> > adjusted. Building something like this would maximize our storage
> > and for cheap. Requiring only 2x4s and 3/4" plywood.
> > I think the shelf space that members are entitled with membership is a
> > little small as well. Most members would have a toolbox or tote on the
> > shelf full of their stuff. The 12"x12" could be a little limiting.
> > Building shelving like this would give us quote a bit of storage space.
> > believe about 15' length of this shelving would yield at least 75x
> > storage totes that measure 20"x15"x15" (LxWxH). That is with shelving 8'
> > tall. With high ceilings, we could potentially go taller, but then
> > could be a concern. If we could score one of those stairs on wheels like
> > they have at Jerry's, that would be nice.
> > Bobs proposal specifies that additional shelving can be purchased per
> > at $5/linear foot. Being that linear foot includes the depth of the
> > that should be sufficient for an additional toolbox or 2' deep container.
> > $5/month does not seem extreme. At $1/ft, a member could rent an entire
> > gorilla rack for $20/month. We could quickly run out of storage space.
> > http://www.homedepot.com/c/how_to_build_garage_shelves_HT_PG_SO
> > -Kevin
> > ________________________________
> > From: Bob Miller <EMAIL HIDDEN>
> > To: Taper Wickel <EMAIL HIDDEN>
> > Cc: discuss <EMAIL HIDDEN>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 9:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: [EMS Discuss] New Storage Rules for Eugene Maker Space
> > I think you're right -- if it's under construction like the vacuum
> > table currently is, then it's a project and it would owe rent. Once
> > it's completed, it could be donated or lent to EMS, or it could become
> > a Gallery Item, or the member could continue to pay rent to store it
> > (and not share it). An interesting edge case is the 3D printers,
> > which are only working part of the time. (-:
> > I don't understand your question about multiple members. I can only
> > think of two things that were limited per-member. Free shelf space.
> > Sure, if two members want to pool their space, that's probably
> > reasonable. And "If the member needs more than 10% of the available
> > floor space for short term storage, he/she must announce his
> > intentions to the membership". In that case, I'd think it's 10% for
> > the project, no matter how many members are involved -- the concern is
> > how much floor space we've lost.
> > And you're right that we're going to have some case-by-case decisions.
> > There's no way to predict every case that will come up.
> > Thanks for your comments. It's probably about time for me to write a
> > summary.
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Taper Wickel <EMAIL HIDDEN> wrote:
> >> Speaking as someone who abuses the current storage regime --
> >> It all looks reasonable to me. I do wonder where the line
> >> would get drawn between project and loaned/donated
> >> equipment? The vacuum former is an obvious example, but I
> >> was also thinking of a if-we-had-more-space build of a
> >> holography sand table; is it a project until it's done, and
> >> then it's equipment? Also -- if multiple members are
> >> working on a project, does that get more space than a
> >> single-member project?
> >> This may be just a case-by-case thing and not need hard
> >> limits, but I figured I'd bring up the questions.
> >> --
> >> Posted from the Discuss forum
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Discuss mailing list
> >> EMAIL HIDDEN
> > --
> > Bob Miller K<bob>
> > EMAIL HIDDEN
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > EMAIL HIDDEN
> Bob Miller K<bob>
> EMAIL HIDDEN
> Discuss mailing list
> EMAIL HIDDEN
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Discuss